February 2010
In this
issue: |
|
► |
How Big is
Your Mailbox? |
|
► |
Taking the Risk Out of
Managing Your Network |
|
► |
Social Networking: Is Your
Identity at Risk? |
|
► |
Virtualization Overview |
|
► |
Cartoon
& Quote |
|
|
Social Networking:
Is Your
Identity
at Risk?
reprinted with permission from HP |
|
 |
|
The total number
of users on the social networking site Facebook has now
soared above the 200 million mark. Just to put that into
perspective: if Facebook were a country, it would be the
fifth largest on Earth, after China, India, the U.S. and
Indonesia. According to a recent report by ComScore, the
number of European Facebook subscribers has grown by 314%
over the past year to nearly 100 million users.
|
|
Read More |
|
|
|
Quote
of the
Month |
|
Opportunity is missed
by most people
because it is dressed
in overalls
and
looks like work.
Thomas Edison
|
|
ASysTech
Supports . . . |
|

|
|
|
|
How Big is Your Mailbox? |
|
We have spent a lot of time recently (which
translates to a lot of extra expense for our customers) troubleshooting,
managing, and working with VERY large mailboxes.
From a purely
technical standpoint, once a mailbox gets over a GB in size, it starts
to become a minor challenge in terms of supporting it, speed of access
and search, and management in general. Once a mailbox gets to be over 2
GB in size, we start to run into some very serious limitations that will
manifest in support, management, and disaster recovery scenarios.
Believe us when we
say we are VERY heavy Outlook users, but using a few simple techniques,
it is not much of a challenge at all to keep our own mailboxes under the
1 GB limit we need to keep us ‘light on our feet' with our own
mailboxes.
First: archive!
Outlook has a built in archive feature that will remove things from your
mailbox and put them into a long term storage file. Our technique is to
add to that archive file daily until it gets to be between 1 and 2 GB in
size, then burn that to a DVD (so that it isn't taking up space on the
server). This can easily be set up to happen automatically in Outlook,
and you can get very granular in your control of what gets archived, how
old it has to be before archive, etc. Just ask us for help to get this
set up.
|
|
Read More |
Taking the Risk Out of
Managing Your
Network |
|
Ever heard a
small-business owner say "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"? This simple
old saying depicts the mentality of thousands of SMBs when it comes to
preventing security breaches and assessing vulnerabilities within their
networks.
If the servers are running, e-mails are
accessible and customers aren't complaining about identity theft --
companies logically assume that their security measures, however
informal, are working. This false sense of security is exactly what
hackers and identity thieves prey on.
The truth of the matter is that networks
of all sizes are vulnerable to attacks and security threats 24/7/365.
Spyware, worms and viruses don't discriminate. If there is a way into
your network, they will find it and you may, or may not, know about it.
Although the short-term impact to your business is obvious, the
long-term impact is what really keeps us up at night.
Security breaches and other malicious
attacks not only take down the network and compromise your company's
data and your customers' privacy, they can ruin your company's
reputation. With competition around every corner, and new laws mandating
the disclosure of data theft to affected consumers, news like this
travels fast. So what should you do?
Depending on
the level of IT support you have on hand, you may try to
safeguard your network by deploying highly publicized
software upgrades and security patches.
|
|
Read More |
|
|
|
|
by Jane Cage, COO, HTS
|
|

|
|
We
live in a world that constantly forces us to "do more with
less". Employees are expected to be more efficient.
Multi-function devices are becoming the standard on many
desktops. We multi-task by answering email, talking on the phone
and reviewing a spreadsheet – all at the same time.
We
shouldn't be surprised then that IT departments are asking the
same of their fileservers. When server utilization gets
measured, we find that many servers have much more capacity than
they actually use for the majority of the time. With so much
excess capacity – why not run more than one server on a single
machine?
|
|
Read More |
|
|
|
Laugh a
Little |
|
 |
|
|
ASysTech
Supports . . . |
 |
|